Monday, July 19, 2010
The Quest for Intellectualism
Friday, March 12, 2010
The plan for the final project.
I would like to write my essay on how people attach themselves to their avatars online. I don’t have a specific thesis at this point, but I will definitely be using “A Rape in Cyberspace” for evidence of whatever I choose to be my thesis. I really fell in love with this text and the idea of people projecting themselves into digital spaces and it eventually having emotional consequences. I want to also bring in the idea of how people can act themselves in a virtual environment without physical restrictions on their personalities, yet they allow their avatars to affect themselves emotionally. I think a good movie to watch for the research of this essay is probably the Matrix Trilogy, partly because it deals with human consciousness over digital spaces, and a good book to reference will probably be Neuromancer by William Gibson.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Everybody reads my blog
Friday, February 26, 2010
cyberape should be allowed in cyberape muds
When Moondreamer ended up crying after she was raped by Mr. Bungle, it shows just how clearly she was attached to her avatar, even though she didn’t realize it at first. I find the fact that people get attached to their avatars even when they don’t mean to a very interesting concept. In the article, there is one quote that fully illustrates the unique space that divides the digital world with the real world: they are trying to figure out how to punish Mr. Bungle for the rape. They wonder if he could be punished for making obscene phone calls, or perhaps by contacting administrators at the university. I am more on the side of the anarchists in the room, believing that when it comes to the digital world, there should be no punishment for crimes unless they transfer over into the real world. If, however, there is a rule on the site that states there is to be no foul language, and one swears, then they must pay the consequences for that action, but the digital world as a whole, if it were to start being policed by the government for example, the digital world would lose all its attraction in my opinion.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Turkle Response 2:Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture
This article is really good in explaining no only why certain people program in certain ways, but it really gets into why it’s ok for them to program that way. For example, on page 137, it describes Alex as he makes a robot rather than a car.
I really identify with the analysis of learning in this article. I really feel like I often times have a unique learning style which changes with each problem I am given. I often can come across as a smart ass because of the odd questions I ask (and sometimes I do this because I think it’s funny), but most often, it’s because the way I address problems is to find what is interesting about a problem and solve it from the perspective that addresses the unique problems of the issue, not just figure out the answer.
So, for example, I, like Alex, would rather build a robot that uses the tires as feet rather than make the same car that every kid around me makes. Facing the problems of making a robot, which no one could assist me with (because it is a new approach and a new idea), is what having fun is all about. Of course, if I was getting a grade, I would probably make a car, but if I was given the freedom to do WHATEVER I WANTED and didn't have to face the pressure of getting a grade, I would most definitely take the robot approach.
So I encourage YOU, to be like Alex, and take the Robot Approach.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
English. What? Do You Speak It.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
i prefer the phrase "prolonging publishing" rather than "procrastinating posting"
In standard style of attempting to write this, I’ve prolonged long enough to actually be more than half a day late. I apologize for letting my team down, and I’ve got a boatload of excuses, some of which include a rave, a dance, working late overnight, and the death of a family friend’s young son. And the Super Bowl tomorrow (which I won’t be watching).
So one thing that I would like to bring up first and foremost about the article I chose, which was titled “Artificial Intelligence and Psychoanalysis”, was that it was published in a journal called Daedalus which as we all know bears the name of a Greek mythological character who was known for being extremely crafty and cunning (look him up on Wikipedia like I did…). The only reason I bring this up is because Daedalus was the one who warned Icarus to not go too close to the sun lest the wax on his wings melt. This is sort of a private joke with me and myself and my blog readers that has to do with the dangers of when technology…goes…too… far.
But moving on to the actual text rather than just the title of the academic journal, look to page 251, she brings up the juicy stuff: a perceptron, “A pattern recognition machine designed in the late 1950’s and a good first example of emergent AI.” This machine reportedly, when asked to identify a triangle only needed to be told whether or not this or that was a triangle, and it would eventually learn what not a triangle was, and what it was. As it also states on page 251, “Perceptrons are not programmed, but learn from the consequences of their actions.”
This is referred to as “anti-Lovelace” technology because there was some famous dude scientist named Lovelace that said computers couldn’t act biologically and couldn’t learn, but this shows that computers can potentially evolve into more complex machines than they were originally designed for. Similar to human brains, computers may eventually be able to withstand certain traumas that injure, but do not completely destroy all functions. At current, often a computer will not function at all when it is damaged, meaning it will not adapt to the damages it acquires and continue operating, but rather quit operating completely.